• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • Rankings
  • Interviews
  • News
  • About

Online MBA Today

The Latest Online MBA News and Reviews

By Christian Amondson

A Review of Princeton Review’s 2015 Online MBA Ranking

The Princeton Review, a leading test preparation, tutoring, and college admission services company, released a new online MBA ranking last month. This is the first time that the Princeton Review exclusively ranked online MBA programs. The ranking lists the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the number one spot, then Indiana University-Bloomington and the IE Business School in Madrid as number two and three respectively.

While Forbes reviewed the new ranking without criticism, it has received a scathing review from Poets and Quants, an MBA news website. Poets and Quants states that the new Princeton Review online MBA ranking is laughable and should be ignored because the methodology is not articulated in quantifiable terms or made transparent to the public, and because its results differed so greatly from other rankings.

Princeton Review Ranking Methodology

The Princeton Review's methodology states that the ranking is determined by "comprehensive surveys conducted in the 2014 academic year of students and administrators at MBA programs offering at least 75% of their program of study online." When looking at a ranking based on quantifiable data, without biases, this methodology leaves a lot to be desired. Anyone that has ever taken a statistics course should see red flags. Compared to the US News & World Report online MBA ranking, the Princeton Review methodology is deficient in content and explanation. But even though the technical aspects of the Princeton Review ranking can be taken with a grain of salt, it should still be taken into account. What is important is the viewer's perspective. There is something that needs to be remembered when viewing this ranking:

The Princeton Review Ranking is different.

Each ranking has its own views of what makes a top business program. They value things differently, just like the public. The Princeton Review obviously did not try to reproduce a ranking by US News & World Report. Maybe the point is that it is different.

If you look into the questions that the Princeton Review asked the students and administrators, almost all of them were subjective, whereas US News & World Report wanted hard facts and figures. Out of the five data points that US News & World Report used, only one data category is subjective: peer review. The Princeton Review on the other hand, seemed to want to produce a ranking that caters more to the left-brain than the right. If this list can be viewed with a better understanding of the focus of the data that was obtained, then prospective students can use this ranking as a resource in an appropriate way.

Ranking Comparisons

Another criticism of this list is that when comparing it to the US News & World Report Ranking, the scores differ dramatically. Based on this dramatic difference, Poets and Quants states that this Princeton Review ranking cannot be taken seriously. They state that "In judging the value of any list and a school's standing on it, you tend to look for consensus across several different rankings. If numerous organizations rank a school similarly, you can interpret that ranking more confidently. When numerical ranks substantially diverge from one list to another, there's plenty of reason to doubt the authenticity of a school's showing." But that is not necessarily the case. The online MBA world is lacking in enough rigorous rankings to give a good view of that. If you compare the ones available now, US News & World Report, Princeton Review, and The Financial Times, you see quite a bit of discrepancy.

PrincetonReview USNWR Financial Times Business-week Economist Forbes
North Carolina (Kenan-Flagler)

1

1 NR – –

–

Indiana (Kelley)

2

1 5 – –

–

IE Business School

3

NR 1 – –

–

Arizona State (Carey)

4

4 12 – –

–

Temple (Fox)

5

1 NR – –

–

Florida (Hough)

6

4 3 – –

–

Rochester Institute of Tech (Saunders)

7

25 NR – –

–

Thunderbird

8

21 NR – –

–

Texas-Dallas (Jindal)

9

6 NR – –

–

Northeastern (D'Amore-McKim)

10

36 4 – –

–

James Madison

11

12 NR – –

–

Auburn (Harbert)

12

10 NR – –

–

North Dakota

13

32 NR – –

–

North Texas

14

47 NR – –

–

Hofstra (Zarb)

15

41 NR – –

–

South Dakota (Beacom)

16

41 NR – –

–

Nebraska-Lincoln

17

21 10 – –

–

Syracuse (Whitman)

18

57 8 – –

–

George Washington

19

44 NR – –

–

North Carolina State

20

9 NR – –

–

West Georgia (Richards)

21

44 NR – –

–

State University of New York-Oswego

22

57 NR – –

–

Memphis (Fogelman)

23

66 NR – –

–

Nevada-Reno

24

29 NR – –

–

Washington State (Carson)

25

21 NR – –

–

But this is actually the norm for the ranking world. If you look at the top rankings of on-campus MBAs, it will give you a better picture. Compare the rankings of US News & World Report, Businessweek, Finanical Times, The Economist, QS, and Eduniversal.

On campus MBA rankings USNWR BusinessWeek Forbes Financial Times Economist QS Ed-universal
Stanford University

1

4 1 4 9 1

3

Harvard University

2

8 3 1 6 1

1

University of Chicago (Booth)

3

3 2 9 1 4

10

University of Pennsylvania (Wharton)

4

2 4 3 11 1

9

Columbia University

5

5 7 6 10 5

7

Northwestern University (Kellogg)

6

7 5 14 14 6

11

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Sloan)

7

14 12 8 12 7

4

University of California—Berkeley (Haas)

8

19 14 10 7 12

5

Duke University (Fuqua)

9

1 8 21 25 13

6

Yale University

10

6 18 17 19 11

2

Dartmouth College (Tuck)

11

15 6 23 2 24

13

University of Michigan—Ann Arbor (Ross)

12

9 10 24 20 8

20

University of California—Los Angeles (Anderson)

13

11 13 25 13 9

15

New York University (Stern)

14

22 23 18 8 10

11

Cornell University (Johnson)

15

13 9 28 23 25

8

University of Virginia (Darden)

16

20 15 32 3 37

19

Carnegie Mellon University (Tepper)

17

10 16 36 22 29

14

University of North Carolina—Chapel Hill (Kenan-Flagler)

18

12 11 39 35 27

16

University of Texas—Austin (McCombs)

19

23 21 40 32 19

18

Indiana University—Bloomington (Kelley)

20

16 19 62 31 21

20

Emory University (Goizueta)

21

18 24 59 17 39

23

Georgetown University (McDonough)

22

24 33 42 42 30

35

University of Southern California (Marshall)

23

21 37 58 64 23

36

Rice University (Jones)

24

25 41 43 33 53

35

Ohio State University (Fisher)

25

34 36 69 28 42

35

As you can see, there is a lot of discrepancy between the rankings, but that is understandable. Each one has its own views of what makes a top business program, which is expressed in their different methodologies, and results in significant differences in their rankings.

Where do we go from here?

Poets and Quants states that they "don't think online MBA rankings matter all that much … Because online programs largely benefit from the reputation and image of the school's brand which is mostly determined by how well a school's full-time MBA program ranks." But don't lose heart in the rankings available! Each prospective students needs to find the best program for them. Not necessarily the "best program in the country," because it might not have the right focus, concentration, cost, schedule, loyalty of the student, etc.

Just like each ranking has different values to consider, each student does as well. It is important to know the basis and focus of whatever rankings are being consulted. This will help you determine how much you should pay attention to that ranking.

Do not make a decision based on one lone ranking, but research multiple places. Thus, this new ranking from the Princeton Review is one to be put in the mix. So, look at the rankings, all of them. They are helpful. There are hundreds of programs to choose from. Let the rankings narrow that list down. Then research and apply. See which ones you get accepted into. See which ones you like the most. The make the most informed decision that you can.

Happy hunting.

Other reviewed rankings:

Financial Times Online MBA Ranking Review

Bloomberg Businessweek MBA Ranking Review

US News and World Report Online MBA Ranking Review

Primary Sidebar

Quick Degree Finder
Onlinembatoday.com is an advertising-supported site. Clicking in this box will show you programs related to your search from schools that compensate us. This compensation does not influence our school rankings, resource guides, or other information published on this site.

Search This Site

Featured Articles

  • The Top Business Trends That Will Drive Success
  • Top 100 Most Affordable Online MBA Programs
  • Top 25 Online MBA Specializations
  • Top 25 Fastest Online MBA Programs
  • Entrepreneurs and MBAs
  • Pre-MBA Coursework Online
  • The Growth of Online MBA Programs
  • Top 10 Reasons to Earn your MBA Online
  • Guide to Executive MBAs
  • Podcasts for Online MBA Students
  • Guide to Online MBAs in Healthcare Management

Online MBA Rankings

  • Top 50 Online MBA Programs in Entrepreneurship
  • Top 25 Online MBA in Sports Management Programs
  • Top 10 Online MBA in Hospitality Programs
  • Top 20 Online MBA in Cybersecurity Programs
  • Top 50 Online MBA in Management Programs
  • Top 50 Online MBA Programs in Finance
  • Top 50 Online MBA Programs in Marketing
  • Top 50 Online MBA Programs in Healthcare Management
  • Top 50 Online MBA Programs in Human Resource Management
  • Top 30 Online MBA Programs in Business Analytics
  • Top 35 Online MBA Programs in Supply Chain Management
  • Top 50 Online MBA Programs in International Business

Online Student Interviews

  • Tracy Farrell, University of Nebraska, Lincoln Online MBA
  • Kristin Bass, East Carolina University
  • Audrey McLaughlin, Kelley School of Business at Indiana University-Bloomington
  • Richard McNeal, Marylhurst University
  • Monica Boggan, Lamar University

Online MBA Director Interviews

  • An Interview with Pam Delany, Director of Graduate Admission and Recruitment of the W.P Carey School of Business at Arizona State University
  • An Interview with Kathy Farrell, Dean of the College of Business at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln
  • An Interview with Hasan Pirkul, Dean of the Naveen Jindal School of Business at the University of Texas at Dallas
  • An Interview with Raj Echambadi, the Dunton Family Dean of the D’Amore-McKim School of Business at Northeastern University
  • An Interview with Rosemary Hartigan and Ravi Mittal of the Graduate School of Business at the University of Maryland University College
  • An Interview with Jeff Tanner, Dean of the Strome College of Business at Old Dominion University
  • An Interview with Dr. Jun Zhao, Dean of the College of Business at Governors State University
  • An Interview with Dr. Gary Schirr, Director of the Online MBA Program at Radford University
  • An Interview with Jeffrey Brown, Dean and professor of Business for the Gies College of Business at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
  • An Interview with Paul Russell, Director of Graduate Programs for the College of Business at East Carolina University
  • An Interview with Carly Broussard, Director of the MBA Program at Lamar University
  • An Interview with Elizabeth Rozell, Associate Dean and Director of the MBA Program for the College of Business at Missouri State University
  • Stacey Dorang Peeler, Managing Director of the Online MBA at Penn State University, Smeal College of Business
  • John Wells, Associate Dean at The University of Massachusetts Amherst, Isenberg School of Management
  • Erin Vincent, Indiana University-Bloomington
  • Jonathon Nichols, The University of Utah, David Eccles School of Business
  • An Interview with Michael Tarantino, Director of Recruitment & Admissions for Graduate Programs at Lehigh University

Employer Interviews

  • Derek Sciba of Crista Ministries

Resource Articles

  • Directory of Online MBA Programs in the U.S.
  • Guide to the GMAT for Online MBA Students
  • Guide to Online Executive MBAs
  • Guide to Supply Chain Management MBAs
  • Guide to Online MBAs in Business Analytics
  • Guide to Online MBAs in Marketing
  • Guide to Online MBAs in Information & Technology
  • Guide to Online MBAs in Finance
  • Guide to Online MBAs in Accounting
  • Guide to Online MBAs in International Business
  • Guide to Online MBAs in Human Resources
  • Guide to Online MBAs in Nonprofit Management
  • Guide to Online MBAs in Entrepreneurship
  • Guide to Online MBAs in Cybersecurity
  • Guide to Online MBAs in Environmental Sustainability

Ranking System Reviews

  • A Review of The Financial Times Online MBA Ranking
  • A Review of US News and World Report Online MBA Ranking
  • A Review of Bloomberg Businessweek 2015 MBA Rankings
  • A Review of Princeton Review’s 2015 Online MBA Ranking
  • A Review of Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) Distance MBA Ranking

MBA News In Review

  • February 2018 News
  • December 2017 News
  • November 2017 News
  • October 2017 News
  • September 2017 News
  • August 2017 News
  • July 2017 News
  • May 2017 News
  • April 2017 News
  • March 2017 News
  • February 2017 News
  • January 2017 News
  • Ranking Methodology
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Advertising Disclosure

Copyright© 2019 · Brunch Pro Theme by Shay Bocks